Search This Blog

Friday, March 8, 2013

Response to Goodman

As promised, here is a link to my full response to Ryan Goodman's provocative new essay on the capture and kill requirements under the laws of war.  In particular, I make two points regarding Goodman's theory that contribute to the stimulating conversation at Lawfare that has been generated by his essay.

First, it is unclear whether one can use specific prohibitions that restrict the use of force as indirect evidence for a more general principle regarding restrictions on the use of force, or necessity, that is then wider than the specific prohibitions.  Second, the history of the concept of necessity in the laws of war, going back to the Lieber Code and its basic structure, appears to cut against Goodman's interesting argument.

Here is the official abstract:

The Capture-Kill Debate: Lost Legislative History or Revisionist History?
In a recent essay, Ryan Goodman offers a vigorous defense of the duty to capture under the law of war and concludes that attacking soldiers have a duty to use the least-restrictive means of accomplishing their objective. In particular, Goodman contends in his new intervention that the scholarly debate has relied on an impoverished reading of the legislative history of the key international protocols drafted in 1973 and 1974. Having un-earthed a wealth of documents regarding those negotiations, he argues that: (i) the law of war already severely restricts the use of force in various contexts by virtue of specific prohibitions on methods of warfare; (ii) the law of war already prohibits killing enemy combatants who are rendered hors de combat; and (iii) the drafters of the Additional Protocols supported a “least-restrictive-means” interpretation of the concept of necessity, meaning that killing is only lawful when soldiers have no other way of neutralizing the enemy (e.g. capture is not feasible).

For reasons that I articulate in the present commentary, I believe that none of these arguments provide definitive support for a duty to capture under the laws of war. First, with regard to Goodman's first two arguments, one cannot move from a list of specific jus in bello prohibitions to a generalized principle regarding the nature military necessity that then swallows and expands the specific rules. Second, the arguments ignore the Lieber Code's definition of military necessity as "all direct destruction of life or limb of armed enemies" and "those measures which are indispensable for securing the ends of the war, and which are lawful according to the modern law and usages of war." Although the law of war has advanced considerably since Lieber, its general structure remains relatively unchanged. Third, the drafters of the Additional Protocol did not codify the least-restrictive means test; its provision on unnecessary suffering cannot be read to include it since unnecessary suffering and unnecessary killing are conceptually distinct.


The full essay can be downloaded here

8 comments:

Allen jeley said...

i read this article and its great help them and tell us how to response when a teacher ask you question during the class thanks for share it paraphrasing online .

Gaurav mehta said...

Nice work by admin West Bengal Madhyamik Result
West Bengal Higher Secondary Result
Tamil Nadu SSLC Result
Tamil Nadu HSC Result
RBSE 12th Result
RBSE 10th Result
Rajasthan Board 12th Result
AP SSC Result
CBSE 10th Result
JKBOSE 12th Result
JKBOSE 10th ResultThanks

Vikas Tiwari said...

RBSE Result 2016

RBSE 10th Result 2016


RBSE 12th Result 2016 Name wise


RBSE 12th Arts Result 2016


RBSE 12th Commerce Result 2016


RBSE 12th Science Result 2016

RBSE 12th Class Result 2016

Vikas Tiwari said...

Sad Status for Whatsapp in Hindi
Whatsapp Status in Hindi Attitude
Romantic Rain Status for Whatsapp
Double Meaning Jokes in Hindi
Hindi Love Shayari

Thomas pedro said...

The RIH plans to guarantee that each individual living in Rhode Island has rise to access on moderate and feasible lodging and group through arrangement of different home loan help like the low-intrigue credits, instruction and advising, bank or servicer motivating forces, and advance alteration programs. A normally utilized government credit alteration program by senior property holders is the graduated home buyback arrange. Cash Advance Chicago

sarah saad said...

http://www.pearltrees.com/khairyayman/item193051311
شركة نقل عفش بالرياض
شركة نقل عفش بجدة
شركة نقل عفش بالدمام
شركة نقل عفش بالمدينة المنورة
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالدمام
شركة نقل اثاث بجدة
شركة نقل اثاث بجدة

Sam Rafferty said...


2nd puc result 2017
Rajasthan Board 12th Result 2017
CBSE Board 12th Result 2017
Assam HS Result 2017
pseb

slope said...

Very interesting to read this article.I would like to thank you for the efforts you had made for writing this awesome article.